What Has Gone So Awry at Zipcar – Is the UK Vehicle-Sharing Market Dead?

A community kitchen in Rotherhithe has provided hundreds of cooked meals weekly for two years to pensioners and needy locals in south London. However, their operations face major disruption by the news that they will not have use of New Year’s Day.

This organization had relied on Zipcar, the car-sharing company that customers to access its fleet of vehicles via smartphone. It sent shockwaves through the capital when it declared it would shut down its UK operations from 1 January.

It will mean many volunteers will be unable to pick up supplies from the Felix Project, which gathers excess produce from grocery stores, cafes and restaurants. Other options are less convenient, costlier, or lack the same flexible hours.

“The impact will be massively,” said Vimal Pandya, the project's founder. “Personally me and my team are worried about the operational hurdle we will face. Many groups like ours are going to struggle.”

“Faced with this reality, everyone is concerned and thinking: ‘How will we continue?’”

A Significant Setback for Urban Car-Sharing

The community kitchen’s drivers are part of over 500,000 people in London who were car club members, now potentially left without easy use to vehicles, avoiding the burden and cost of ownership. The vast majority of those people were probably with Zipcar, which held a dominant position in the city.

This shutdown, pending consultation with employees, is a serious setback to the vision that car sharing in cities could reduce the need for owning a car. Yet, some experts have noted that Zipcar’s departure need not spell the end for the idea in Britain.

The Potential of Shared Mobility

Shared vehicle use is valued by many urbanists and green advocates as a way of reducing the ills linked to vehicle ownership. Typically, vehicles sit idle on the street for 95% of the time, occupying parking. They also require large carbon emissions to produce, and people who do not own cars tend to walk, cycle and take public transport more. That helps urban areas – reducing congestion and pollution – and improves people’s health through increased activity.

What Went Wrong?

The company started in 2000 before its acquisition by the US car rental group Avis Budget in 2013. Zipcar’s UK income barely registered compared with its parent company's total earnings, and a deficit that grew to £11.7m in 2024 gave no reason to continue.

The parent company stated the closure is part of a “wider restructuring across our international business, where we are taking deliberate steps to simplify processes, improve returns”.

Its latest financial reports said revenues had fallen as drivers took less frequent, shorter trips. “This trend reflect the continuing effect of the economic squeeze, which is dampening demand for non-essential services,” it said.

London's Unique Challenges

Yet, industry observers noted that London has specific problems that made it difficult for the sector to succeed.

  • Inconsistent Rules: With numerous local councils, car-club operators face a mosaic of different procedures and prices that complicate operations.
  • New Costs: The closure coincides with electric cars becoming liable for London’s congestion charge, adding extra expenses.
  • Unequal Parking Fees: Locals in some boroughs pay just £63 for a annual electric car parking permit. A floating car club would pay over £1,100 per year, creating a major disincentive.

“Our fees should be one-twentieth of a resident’s permit,” said Robert Schopen of Co Wheels. “We’re taking cars off the street. We introduce cleaner models in their place.”

Lessons from Abroad

Other European countries offer examples for London to follow. Germany enacted national shared mobility laws in 2017, providing a unified system for parking, support and waivers. Now, the country has 5.4 shared cars per 10,000 people, while France has 2.1 and Belgium has 6.3. The UK lags behind at 0.7.

“What we see is that car sharing around the world, especially in Europe, is expanding,” said Bharath Devanathan of Invers.

He suggested authorities should start to treat car sharing as a form of public transport, and link it with train and bus stations. He added that a potential operator was already seriously considering entering the London market: “There will be fill this gap.”

The Future Landscape

Other players can roughly be divided into two camps:

  1. Company-Owned Fleets: Which own or lease their own cars. This includes Denmark’s GreenMobility, France’s Free2Move, and Germany’s Miles Mobility.
  2. Peer-to-Peer Services: Which allow users to hire out their own vehicles via an app – similar to Airbnb for cars. Players include Britain’s Hiyacar and the US’s Getaround and Turo.

One company, a US-headquartered P2P service, is already weighing up the UK gap. Rory Brimmer, its UK managing director, said there was a “big opportunity” to win more users. “A space exists that is going to need to be filled, because London still needs to move,” Brimmer said.

Yet, it could take a while for other players to build momentum. For now, more people may choose to buy cars, and many across London will be without a convenient option.

For Rotherhithe community kitchen, the next month will be a scramble to find a solution. The logistical challenge caused by Zipcar’s exit underscores the wider implications of its departure on vital services and the prospects of shared mobility in the UK.

Heather Reid
Heather Reid

Award-winning journalist with a focus on Central European affairs and investigative reporting.